SEAMONSTER.
ServicesPortfolioAboutStart a project
Seamonster Coding - Software Development

Web development, custom software, and embedded C/C++ engineering for businesses in California's Central Valley.

Company

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

  • Services Overview
  • Web Development
  • Software Development
  • Embedded Systems
  • Portfolio

Contact

  • Emailmckay@seamonstercoding.com
  • LocationFresno–Clovis, California
© 2026 Seamonster Coding. All rights reserved.
Privacy PolicyTerms of Service
All portfolio studies

Embedded systems · Implementation study

Closed-loop motor control in C and C++

How speed feedback, timer-driven control, and a suitable motor driver work together to regulate a motor under changing load.

What the demo shows

The rotating graphic, RPM, current, and duty cycle are scripted examples. No motor, physical feedback loop, or controller tuning is running in this page.

Proposed system flow

  1. 01Speed feedback
  2. 02Control calculation
  3. 03PWM and driver
  4. 04Motor response

Implementation approach

The following describes a production approach behind this example. The validation plan identifies checks to perform, not reported test results.

01

Match the controller to the motor

A practical implementation begins with the motor type, supply, driver, load, and feedback sensor. For a brushed DC speed-control example, a microcontroller timer can produce PWM for a suitable power driver while encoder measurements estimate shaft speed. PWM specifies the fraction of each cycle that is active; duty cycle is not itself a measured RPM value. Other motor types can require different commutation and control strategies.

Zephyr: pulse-width modulation

02

Run the feedback loop on a defined schedule

At each control interval, firmware would compare target and measured speed and update a PI or PID controller. Arm's CMSIS-DSP library provides PID primitives for floating-point and fixed-point implementations. Gains must match the selected update interval and physical plant. Output limits, integral windup handling, and startup behavior would be designed explicitly; adding a PID library alone does not establish stability.

Arm CMSIS-DSP: PID controllers

03

Keep control independent of the dashboard

The device would enforce current limits, feedback timeouts, and fault handling locally. A web interface could request bounded setpoints and display telemetry, while the time-critical loop stays on the controller. Network loss must have a defined response. Where the machinery requires protective shutdown, that protection needs an appropriate hardware and system design independent of a browser command.

Validation plan

  • Measure overshoot, settling time, steady-state error, and loop timing under representative load.
  • Test startup, stall, disconnected feedback, and commanded speed limits on a controlled test bench.
  • Verify the selected fault response during network loss and processor reset.

More in embedded systems

Counter-UAS detection: tracking a five-pixel drone against open skyWi-Fi presence sensing with Raspberry Pi and C++Sensor telemetry from firmware to dashboardAn edge gateway for devices and cloud services

Have a similar problem to solve?

Discuss your project